Card no.01
ZoneWhole site
TaskPackage cover: one record per asset
RevA · 10/2026
Work package CS-05CARD 1 OF 7
Defence industry · Pragmatos 3.0 case study

Pragmatos at a Defence Component and Overhaul Site

A site that machines, tests and overhauls drivetrain and hydraulic assemblies for military land vehicles. Each machine, rig and bench with a read path goes onto one record per asset, on the site's own servers.

Asset status board · a site like this, todayeach on its own screen
5-axis centres ×6M-01…M-06Makers A · B
Turning centres ×4M-07…M-10Maker C
Measuring machines ×2CMM-01 CMM-02Maker D
Heat-treat furnaceHT-01Maker E · 1998
Gearbox rigs ×3TR-01…TR-03Maker F · three generations
Hydraulic benches ×2HB-01 HB-02Maker G
Power-pack test cellTC-01Maker H
Overhaul bays ×4OB-1…OB-4Torque tools · Maker I

Starting point

Every machine and rig keeps its own records on its own PC, with its own clock. A failed test run is pieced together from three places. Audit evidence for a serial number is assembled by hand from binders and spreadsheets.

Approach

A read-only edge reads each asset over an interface it already has, or one the survey confirms. Pragmatos puts those assets on one record with one clock, on servers inside the site. The data stays on the site.

What it does not do

Pragmatos does not run a machine, a rig or a test cell, and it releases no part. It touches no weapon or mission system. It reads, records and shows.

MODELLED €144,225 a year

Four results for a site of this size, each with its inputs on card 7. Overhaul turnaround is shown, not counted.

Pragmatos 3.0 · defence industry case studyCrius SoftwarePerformed byInspected by1
Card no.02
ZoneWhole site
TaskInduction: the site, asset by asset
RevA · 10/2026
Work package CS-05CARD 2 OF 7
Card 2 · induction

The Site, Asset by Asset

A site like this has three halls. The machining hall makes housings, shafts and gears. The test hall runs every finished gearbox, hydraulic unit and power pack before release. The overhaul shop strips, repairs and re-tests assemblies that come back from service. Most of the equipment was bought in different decades, from different makers.

ZoneAssetIDsMakerIn sinceRead pathWhere its data lives today
Machining5-axis machining centres ×6M-01…06A · B2009 · 2019Existing interfaceEach machine's own panel
Turning centres ×4M-07…10C2004 · 2016Existing interfaceEach machine's own panel
Coordinate measuring machines ×2CMM-01, 02D2014SurveyReport files on the measuring PC
Heat-treatment furnaceHT-01E1998SurveyA chart recorder and a paper batch card
Test hallGearbox test rigs ×3TR-01…03F1994 · 2012 · 2023Existing interface
Survey for TR-01
A rig PC each, three file formats
Hydraulic test benches ×2HB-01, 02G2008Existing interfaceThe bench PC and a printed run sheet
Power-pack test cellTC-01H2017Existing interfaceThe cell's own control PC
OverhaulNetworked torque tools ×8TQ-01…08I2020SurveyThe tool controller's own log
Overhaul bays ×4OB-1…4––SurveyPaper job cards and a whiteboard
SiteCalibration register, gauges and torque tools–––Entered once per instrumentA spreadsheet of due dates
Compressors and hall power meters–JmixedSurveyThe site meter, read monthly

Makers are lettered, not named. Survey means the interface survey confirms a read path before the scope is fixed. An asset without one stays out of scope until it has one.

32assets on the floor
10makers, A to J
4decades of controllers
0clocks they share

What a Returned Gearbox Meets

A gearbox comes back from service with a fault report. Its last acceptance run sits on the 2012 rig PC, its measuring report on the CMM PC, its last overhaul torque values in a tool controller's log, and the calibration status of every gauge in a spreadsheet. Before any work starts, someone collects all of it by serial number.

Pragmatos 3.0 · defence industry case studyCrius SoftwarePerformed byInspected by2
Card no.03
ZoneWhole site
TaskFindings: six pressures on a site like this
RevA · 10/2026
Work package CS-05CARD 3 OF 7
Card 3 · findings

Six Findings, Tagged

Five tags are industry-wide pressures, sourced below. The sixth comes from the site's own induction. The site already has the data for each. It is never on one record.

NCR-01Machining hall

Output has to rise, on the machines already in the hall

NATO allies have committed to 5% of GDP for defence and security by 2035.S1 The EU calls its defence industry constrained by peacetime-sized production capacity.S2

ConsequenceMore shifts on the same spindles. A lost hour now costs output that is already promised.

NCR-02Overhaul shop

Returned assemblies wait, and nobody can say for how long

A US audit found depot maintenance delays have grown considerably since 2019, on ageing equipment with parts shortages.S3 Germany's armed forces commissioner ranks material availability as highly as major equipment.S4

ConsequenceTurnaround is the readiness number. Without a record per serial number it is an estimate.

NCR-03Whole site

The people who know the old machines are retiring

The EU names an ageing workforce among the roots of the industry's skills gap.S2 The knowledge of which rig drifts, and why, sits with a few long-serving people.

ConsequenceWhen they leave, the reasons behind a reading leave with them.

NCR-04Site boundary

The data has to stay on networks the site controls

German contract rules for restricted-classified work allow connected systems only with access started from inside the protected network.S5

ConsequenceAny tool that needs an outside service to work is out before the evaluation starts.

NCR-05Test hall

Traceability is mandatory where a part can cost a life

NATO's quality requirements make traceability mandatory wherever a failed item could lead to the loss of equipment, performance or life.S6

ConsequenceEach serial number needs its machine, rig run and sign-off on one trail, not in three binders.

NCR-06Whole site

Ten makers, four decades, no shared clock

The induction on card 2 counts 32 assets from 10 makers. Rig PCs, controller memory and paper each keep their own time.

ConsequenceLining up a rig failure with the machine that made the part is a manual hunt.

Sources

  1. NATO, The Hague Summit Declaration, 25 June 2025. A political commitment, not law.
  2. European Commission and High Representative, A new European Defence Industrial Strategy, JOIN(2024) 10 final, 5 March 2024.
  3. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Air Force Readiness: Actions Needed to Address Depot Maintenance Delays and Staffing Challenges, GAO-26-107890, May 2026. US scope.
  4. Deutscher Bundestag, Jahresbericht 2025 des Wehrbeauftragten, Drucksache 21/4200, 3 March 2026.
  5. BAAINBw, VS-NfD-Merkblatt (GHB Anlage 4), as of 1 September 2023. A contract annex, not a statute.
  6. NATO Standardization Office, AQAP-2110 Edition D Version 1, June 2016, clause 5.4.8.
Pragmatos 3.0 · defence industry case studyCrius SoftwarePerformed byInspected by3
Card no.04
ZoneSite network
TaskTask: one record per asset
RevA · 10/2026
Work package CS-05CARD 4 OF 7
Card 4 · the task

Every Asset on One Clock

A read-only edge on the site network reads each asset over the path the survey confirmed. The edge holds about 72 hours if the link to the server drops. Pragmatos Live gives every value a name, a timestamp and an asset ID, on servers inside the site.

SITE BOUNDARY · SERVERS INSIDEMACHINING HALLTEST HALLOVERHAUL SHOP5-axis ×6M-01…06 · A BTurning ×4M-07…10 · CCMM ×2CMM-01 02 · DFurnaceHT-01 · ERigs ×3TR-01…03 · FHydraulic ×2HB-01 02 · GTest cellTC-01 · HCalibrationentered onceTorque tools ×8TQ-01…08 · IOverhaul bays ×4OB-1…4RRSSRSRRSSREAD-ONLY EDGE · no write path · holds about 72 h if the link dropsPRAGMATOS CORE · one record per asset · one clockR = existing interface · S = the survey confirms a path first · no mark = entered by hand

It Reads

  • Machine states and alarms, per machine
  • Rig and bench channels during a test run: speed, torque, temperature, pressure
  • Test-cell run data
  • Torque-tool results, once the survey finds a path
  • Calibration due dates, entered once per instrument

It Records

  • Each stop, with the asset's last values before it
  • Each test run against the serial number of the unit on the rig
  • The cause a named engineer approves
  • Who changed a rule or a role, and when

It Shows

  • Availability per asset: machines, rigs, benches and the test cell
  • The stop history, by cause
  • Gauges and tools coming due for calibration
  • An evidence pack per serial number, for audits and acceptance

The Rig Stays With the Test Engineer

The edge has no write path. Pragmatos does not start a run, set a load or change a machine program. It releases no part and signs no record. Engineers and inspectors decide; Pragmatos gives them one record to decide from. It connects to production, test and maintenance equipment only.

Pragmatos 3.0 · defence industry case studyCrius SoftwarePerformed byInspected by4
Card no.05
ZoneWhole site
TaskPhased work: induction to release
RevA · 10/2026
Work package CS-05CARD 5 OF 7
Card 5 · phased work

Through the Bays: Induct to Release

An assembly moves through an overhaul shop bay by bay, and nothing leaves a bay until it is signed. The rollout follows the same order. Each bay door shows its weeks, and each step is signed before the next asset is added.

WK 0–11INDUCTsigned ▢WK 1–32SURVEYsigned ▢WK 4–83CONNECTsigned ▢WK 9–124RULESsigned ▢WK 13–145RELEASEsigned ▢
BayWeeksStepWhat happensSigned byCard
10 – 1InductThe site's IT and security team sets the rules for the servers inside the site, and the edge's place on the network.IT and security leadPerf Insp
21 – 3SurveyLists what each asset records today and confirms a read path for each one. Assets without a path are named out of scope.Manufacturing and test engineersPerf Insp
34 – 8ConnectMachining hall first, then the test hall. The asset IDs and tag names are agreed. Availability runs per asset.Production manager; test-hall leadPerf Insp
49 – 12RulesTest runs are tied to serial numbers. Stop-cause rules and calibration-due rules go live once a named engineer approves them.Quality engineerPerf Insp
513 – 14ReleaseThe first evidence pack per serial goes to the quality team, and roles and the change history are checked against the site's own rules.Quality managerPerf Insp
Pragmatos 3.0 · defence industry case studyCrius SoftwarePerformed byInspected by5
Card no.06
ZoneWhole site
TaskReadiness return: what one record is worth
RevA · 10/2026
Work package CS-05CARD 6 OF 7
Card 6 · readiness return · MODELLED

What One Record Is Worth, Per Year

Each row counts the same thing twice, block for block: hollow blocks for today, filled blocks with one record. Fewer blocks is better. Every input is on card 7 and can be replaced with the site's own figure.

todaywith one record, modelledEvery block in a row stands for the same amount, shown in that row
R1 · Audit and Acceptance Evidence1 BLOCK = 1 engineer-day · C-01 to C-03
Today48
One record12
€30,60036 engineer-days a year

Engineer-days a year spent assembling traceability evidence by serial number: measuring reports, test runs, torque values and calibration status.

R2 · Piecing Together a Failed Test Run1 BLOCK = 12 engineer-hours · C-04 to C-10
Today432
One record108
€34,425324 engineer-hours a year

About 36 runs a year fail and need a cause. Today each takes 12 hours to line up the rig file, the machining history and the overhaul record; with one record, 3.

R3 · Machining-Hall Hours Lost to Stops1 BLOCK = 80 machine-hours · C-11 to C-17
Today3,200
One record2,720
€52,800480 machine-hours a year back

Hours lost to unplanned stops. The hours that come back are stops with a cause on the record, so the repeat is fixed rather than met again.

R4 · Test Runs Repeated for an Incomplete Record1 BLOCK = 1 test run · C-18 to C-20
Today15
One record4
€26,40011 fewer repeated runs a year

Runs repeated because a channel, a timestamp or a serial was missing from the record, not because the unit failed.

Total, a year, for a site of this size (card 7, Total row). The four do not overlap. R2 counts failures that still happen; R4 counts only runs repeated for a gap in the record. Overhaul turnaround and readiness are shown on the record, not counted here.

€144,225
Pragmatos 3.0 · defence industry case studyCrius SoftwarePerformed byInspected by6
Card no.07
ZoneWhole site
TaskCalculation sheet: every figure, with its inputs
RevA · 10/2026
Work package CS-05CARD 7 OF 7
Card 7 · calculation sheet

Every Figure, With Its Inputs

RowInput or stepValueKind
C-01Engineer-day, loaded cost€850ASSUMED
R1 · Audit and acceptance evidence
C-02Engineer-days a year assembling evidence by serial number, today48ASSUMED
C-03The same, with one record12ASSUMED
R1(C-02 − C-03) × C-01€30,600DERIVED
R2 · Failed test runs pieced together
C-04Rigs, benches and test cells in the test hall6ASSUMED
C-05Test runs a year, all of them360ASSUMED
C-06Share of runs that fail and need a cause10%ASSUMED
C-07Failed runs a year = C-05 × C-0636DERIVED
C-08Hours to piece one together, today12ASSUMED
C-09The same, with one record3ASSUMED
C-10Hours a year = (C-08 − C-09) × C-07324DERIVED
R2C-10 ÷ 8 × C-01€34,425DERIVED
R3 · Machining-hall hours found
C-11Machining centres and turning centres10ASSUMED
C-12Planned hours a machine a year, two shifts4,000ASSUMED
C-13Share of planned hours lost to unplanned stops8%ASSUMED
C-14Hours lost a year = C-11 × C-12 × C-133,200DERIVED
C-15Share that comes back once every stop has a cause15%ASSUMED
C-16Hours back a year = C-14 × C-15480DERIVED
C-17Contribution per machine-hour, with a full order book€110ASSUMED
R3C-16 × C-17€52,800DERIVED
R4 · Test runs repeated for an incomplete record
C-18Runs repeated a year for a gap in the record, today15ASSUMED
C-19The same, with one record4ASSUMED
C-20Cost of one repeated run: rig hours, technician, energy€2,400ASSUMED
R4(C-18 − C-19) × C-20€26,400DERIVED
TotalR1 + R2 + R3 + R4€144,225DERIVED

ASSUMED a stated input for a site of this size; replace it with the site’s own figure. DERIVED arithmetic on the rows above.

Not counted: overhaul turnaround, the share of assemblies ready for issue, and calibration overruns. They are shown on the record and left out of the total, because their value depends on contracts this sheet cannot see.

Pragmatos 3.0 · defence industry case studyCrius SoftwarePerformed byInspected by7